GUSA vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
GUSA and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GUSA is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 5, 2022. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GUSA or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between GUSA and BDGS is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GUSA vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GUSA:
1.71
BDGS:
3.96
GUSA:
2.32
BDGS:
7.01
GUSA:
1.31
BDGS:
2.22
GUSA:
2.58
BDGS:
8.67
GUSA:
10.45
BDGS:
37.97
GUSA:
2.13%
BDGS:
0.55%
GUSA:
13.01%
BDGS:
5.25%
GUSA:
-19.30%
BDGS:
-5.38%
GUSA:
-2.39%
BDGS:
-0.14%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.57% return.
GUSA
2.31%
-1.55%
7.63%
19.45%
N/A
N/A
BDGS
2.57%
0.06%
8.94%
20.47%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUSA vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GUSA vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GUSA
BDGS
GUSA vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GUSA vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 1.14% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.46% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.77% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GUSA vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GUSA vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.62%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.