PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GSST vs. NEAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GSST and NEAR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

GSST vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.67%
1.78%
GSST
NEAR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSST:

11.16

NEAR:

3.38

Sortino Ratio

GSST:

29.87

NEAR:

5.05

Omega Ratio

GSST:

6.50

NEAR:

1.71

Calmar Ratio

GSST:

68.71

NEAR:

7.27

Martin Ratio

GSST:

341.52

NEAR:

21.09

Ulcer Index

GSST:

0.02%

NEAR:

0.26%

Daily Std Dev

GSST:

0.55%

NEAR:

1.65%

Max Drawdown

GSST:

-3.51%

NEAR:

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

GSST:

-0.01%

NEAR:

-0.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than NEAR's 0.55% return.


GSST

YTD

0.82%

1M

0.49%

6M

2.70%

1Y

6.08%

5Y*

2.83%

10Y*

N/A

NEAR

YTD

0.55%

1M

0.43%

6M

1.88%

1Y

5.54%

5Y*

2.92%

10Y*

2.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSST vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


NEAR
iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for NEAR: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for GSST: current value at 0.16% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.16%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSST vs. NEAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSST is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSST is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSST is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSST is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSST is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSST is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEAR is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSST vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GSST, currently valued at 11.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.0011.163.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for GSST, currently valued at 29.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0029.875.05
The chart of Omega ratio for GSST, currently valued at 6.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.006.501.71
The chart of Calmar ratio for GSST, currently valued at 68.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0068.717.27
The chart of Martin ratio for GSST, currently valued at 341.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00341.5221.09
GSST
NEAR

The current GSST Sharpe Ratio is 11.16, which is higher than the NEAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSST and NEAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.16
3.38
GSST
NEAR

Dividends

GSST vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison

GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than NEAR's 4.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSST
Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF
5.39%5.45%4.98%1.97%0.71%1.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEAR
iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF
4.97%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%0.85%

Drawdowns

GSST vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, smaller than the maximum NEAR drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and NEAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.01%
-0.04%
GSST
NEAR

Volatility

GSST vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.20%, while iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.20%
0.37%
GSST
NEAR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab