GUSA vs. GGUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS).
GUSA and GGUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GUSA is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 5, 2022. GGUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. Both GUSA and GGUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GUSA vs. GGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUSA vs. GGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | -3.63% | 17.51% | 24.46% | 4.91% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | -8.04% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly higher than GGUS's -8.04% return.
GUSA
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 18.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGUS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -7.97%
- 1Y
- 18.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUSA vs. GGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GGUS's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GUSA vs. GGUS — Risk / Return Rank
GUSA
GGUS
GUSA vs. GGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUSA | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.83 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | 4.36 | +2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSA | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.83 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.95 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSA and GGUS is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GUSA vs. GGUS - Dividend Comparison
GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than GGUS's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 1.11% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.00% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GUSA vs. GGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum GGUS drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and GGUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSA | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -22.59% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -14.91% | +2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -11.06% | +5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -3.24% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.35% | -1.72% |
Volatility
GUSA vs. GGUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) is 5.44%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that GUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUSA | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 6.66% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 12.09% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 21.82% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 19.28% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 19.28% | -1.82% |