GSST vs. MBB

In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than MBB's 2.12% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than MBB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GSST Sharpe Ratio is 7.58, which is higher than the MBB Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSST and MBB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than MBB's 4.09% yield.

The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, smaller than the maximum MBB drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and MBB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.23%, while iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.