GSST vs. ICSH
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH).
GSST and ICSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSST is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 15, 2019. ICSH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD). It was launched on Dec 11, 2013.
Performance
GSST vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSST vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 0.76% | 5.20% | 6.01% | 6.08% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 1.74% | 2.65% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 0.74% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 2.09% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSST having a 0.76% return and ICSH slightly lower at 0.74%.
GSST
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSST vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GSST vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
GSST
ICSH
GSST vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.29 | 10.86 | -4.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 11.28 | 25.58 | -14.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.26 | 6.41 | -3.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.26 | 45.33 | -27.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 113.51 | 283.87 | -170.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.29 | 10.86 | -4.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.79 | 7.40 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.72 | 1.90 | +1.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSST and ICSH is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSST vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, which matches ICSH's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.56% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.46% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
GSST vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, smaller than the maximum ICSH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and ICSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -3.94% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | -0.10% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.19% | -0.73% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.08% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.02% | +0.02% |
Volatility
GSST vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) has a higher volatility of 0.25% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that GSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 0.16% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.42% | 0.26% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 0.41% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 0.48% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 1.06% | -0.19% |