PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 8.45% return.


GSUS

1D
1.78%
1M
3.46%
6M
12.63%
YTD
13.45%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.97%

OUSA

1D
1.27%
1M
3.71%
6M
5.67%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.76M$7.99M$8.97M
$880.04K$1.30M$1.44M

GSUS vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
13.45%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
8.45%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and OUSA is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between GSUS and OUSA has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GSUS vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
OUSA

Technology

38.6%
23.7%

Financial Services

11.4%
18.6%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
13.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
15.1%

Industrials

8.2%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
7.4%

Energy

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Technology

GSUS
38.6%
OUSA
23.7%

Financial Services

GSUS
11.4%
OUSA
18.6%

Communication Services

GSUS
10.4%
OUSA
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
9.7%
OUSA
13.1%

Healthcare

GSUS
9.0%
OUSA
15.1%

Industrials

GSUS
8.2%
OUSA
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.5%
OUSA
7.4%

Energy

GSUS
3.0%
OUSA

-

Utilities

GSUS
2.0%
OUSA

-

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.6%
OUSA

-

Real Estate

GSUS
1.6%
OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSUS vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSUSOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.93

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

6.75

+3.83

GSUS vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-33.12%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-8.36%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-13.14%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-19.54%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-3.50%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.39%

-0.19%

Volatility

GSUS vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.81%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.81%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

8.12%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

10.31%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

13.39%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

15.20%

+1.83%

GSUS vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSUS vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than OUSA's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.96%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.33%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSUS and OUSA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSUS has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to OUSA (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 12.97% vs 9.18% for OUSA. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.96% for GSUS.

GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.48% for OUSA.

GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer