GSUS vs. MFUS
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
GSUS vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUS vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 34.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and MFUS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GSUS and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
MFUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
MFUS
Communication Services
GSUS
MFUS
Financial Services
GSUS
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
MFUS
Healthcare
GSUS
MFUS
Industrials
GSUS
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
MFUS
Energy
GSUS
MFUS
Utilities
GSUS
MFUS
Real Estate
GSUS
MFUS
Basic Materials
GSUS
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
MFUS
GSUS vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 4.41 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 18.13 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.63 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.79 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -35.21% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -6.39% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -15.39% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -18.22% | -7.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -4.00% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.55% | +0.48% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.19% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 8.22% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 10.72% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 15.03% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 17.35% | -0.29% |
GSUS vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUS vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUS and MFUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.98% for GSUS.
GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer