GSUS vs. HLAL
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
GSUS vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUS vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 39.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and HLAL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GSUS and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
HLAL
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
HLAL
Communication Services
GSUS
HLAL
Financial Services
GSUS
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
HLAL
Healthcare
GSUS
HLAL
Industrials
GSUS
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
HLAL
Energy
GSUS
HLAL
Utilities
GSUS
HLAL
Real Estate
GSUS
HLAL
Basic Materials
GSUS
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
HLAL
GSUS vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 4.30 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 19.85 | -6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 3.33 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.91 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.89 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -33.57% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -10.20% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -21.67% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -23.18% | -2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.07% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -5.00% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.20% | -0.17% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.70% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 9.95% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 13.17% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 17.60% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 20.21% | -3.15% |
GSUS vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUS vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GSUS and HLAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 13.64% for GSUS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 13.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer