GSUS vs. FTCS
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for FTCS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
GSUS vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.01% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
GSUS vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.01% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | -10.22% | 26.75% | 22.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and FTCS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GSUS and FTCS has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GSUS vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
FTCS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
FTCS
Communication Services
GSUS
FTCS
Financial Services
GSUS
FTCS
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
FTCS
Healthcare
GSUS
FTCS
Industrials
GSUS
FTCS
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
FTCS
Energy
GSUS
FTCS
Utilities
GSUS
FTCS
-
Real Estate
GSUS
FTCS
-
Basic Materials
GSUS
FTCS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
FTCS
GSUS vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.05 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 0.30 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 0.73 | +12.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 0.23 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.41 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.50 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -53.64% | +28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -7.74% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -12.62% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -20.93% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -6.95% | +6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -6.92% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.14% | -1.11% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 2.64%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.64% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 6.99% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 9.82% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 13.13% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 15.54% | +1.52% |
GSUS vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUS vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FTCS's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUS and FTCS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSUS has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FTCS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs FTCS's -53.64%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 5.40% for FTCS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.
FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.98% for GSUS.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.53% for FTCS.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer