PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. FTCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 8.52% return.


GSUS

1D
1.78%
1M
3.46%
6M
12.63%
YTD
13.45%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.97%

FTCS

1D
0.78%
1M
2.71%
6M
3.02%
YTD
8.52%
1Y
10.05%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.72%
ALL TIME*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$54.34M$52.61M$63.63M
$4.76M$7.99M$8.97M

GSUS vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
13.45%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
8.52%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%23.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and FTCS is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between GSUS and FTCS has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GSUS vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
FTCS

Technology

38.6%
13.0%

Financial Services

11.4%
20.5%

Communication Services

10.4%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
7.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
18.7%

Industrials

8.2%
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
14.3%

Energy

3.0%
2.0%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Technology

GSUS
38.6%
FTCS
13.0%

Financial Services

GSUS
11.4%
FTCS
20.5%

Communication Services

GSUS
10.4%
FTCS
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
9.7%
FTCS
7.8%

Healthcare

GSUS
9.0%
FTCS
18.7%

Industrials

GSUS
8.2%
FTCS
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.5%
FTCS
14.3%

Energy

GSUS
3.0%
FTCS
2.0%

Utilities

GSUS
2.0%
FTCS

-

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.6%
FTCS
2.1%

Real Estate

GSUS
1.6%
FTCS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSUS vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSUSFTCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.30

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

2.90

+7.69

GSUS vs. FTCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the FTCS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and FTCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and FTCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSFTCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-53.64%

+28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-7.74%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-12.62%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-20.93%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.65%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-6.89%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.48%

-1.28%

Volatility

GSUS vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) have volatilities of 4.18% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSFTCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

4.11%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

8.14%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

10.56%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

13.25%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

15.56%

+1.47%

GSUS vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSUS vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FTCS's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.07%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.96%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSUS and FTCS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSUS has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to FTCS (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs FTCS's -53.64%.

On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 12.97% vs 6.32% for FTCS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.96% for GSUS.

GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.53% for FTCS.

GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and FTCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer