GSUS vs. BBUS
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
GSUS vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSUS having a 10.67% return and BBUS slightly lower at 10.60%.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUS vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 34.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and BBUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between GSUS and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
BBUS
Communication Services
GSUS
BBUS
Financial Services
GSUS
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
BBUS
Healthcare
GSUS
BBUS
Industrials
GSUS
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
BBUS
Energy
GSUS
BBUS
Utilities
GSUS
BBUS
Real Estate
GSUS
BBUS
Basic Materials
GSUS
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
BBUS
GSUS vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.00 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 13.76 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.79 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.84 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -35.35% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.21% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -19.01% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -25.46% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.74% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -5.46% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.00% | +0.03% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.88% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 8.96% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 11.87% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 17.03% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 19.59% | -2.53% |
GSUS vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GSUS and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSUS has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for GSUS.
GSUS and BBUS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.
GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer