PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 10.61% return.


BBUS

1D
0.73%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.38%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.77%

SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.56M$23.62M$29.53M
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M

BBUS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
9.70%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and SPTM is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.99

The correlation between BBUS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
SPTM

Technology

38.7%
36.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
12.5%

Communication Services

9.9%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
9.3%

Industrials

8.6%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.5%

Energy

3.0%
3.5%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.2%

Technology

BBUS
38.7%
SPTM
36.3%

Financial Services

BBUS
11.6%
SPTM
12.5%

Communication Services

BBUS
9.9%
SPTM
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.4%
SPTM
9.1%

Healthcare

BBUS
8.9%
SPTM
9.3%

Industrials

BBUS
8.6%
SPTM
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.4%
SPTM
4.5%

Energy

BBUS
3.0%
SPTM
3.5%

Utilities

BBUS
2.2%
SPTM
2.6%

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.6%
SPTM
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBUSSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.31

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

10.07

-1.44

BBUS vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-54.80%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.68%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-18.87%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-24.14%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.11%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-9.00%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.99%

+0.20%

Volatility

BBUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.50%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

10.02%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

12.81%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

16.97%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.03%

+1.47%

BBUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BBUS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBUS has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to SPTM (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 12.48% vs 12.29% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.

BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer