BBUS vs. SPTM
BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 13.03%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
BBUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 10.17% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
BBUS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 9.41% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 10.17% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 16.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and SPTM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.99 |
The correlation between BBUS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBUS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBUS
SPTM
Financial Services
BBUS
SPTM
Communication Services
BBUS
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
SPTM
Healthcare
BBUS
SPTM
Industrials
BBUS
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
SPTM
Energy
BBUS
SPTM
Utilities
BBUS
SPTM
Real Estate
BBUS
SPTM
Basic Materials
BBUS
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
SPTM
BBUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.10 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 14.03 | -1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -54.80% | +19.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -8.68% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -18.87% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -24.14% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.50% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -9.03% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.92% | +0.15% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 4.70% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 4.60% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 9.74% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 12.46% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 16.95% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 18.08% | +1.51% |
BBUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SPTM's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, BBUS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBUS has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to SPTM (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.15% vs 13.03% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.99% for BBUS.
BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer