PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.01% return.


BBUS

1D
0.21%
1M
5.50%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.70%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.43%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and VTI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.99

The correlation between BBUS and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
VTI

Technology

37.1%
33.5%

Financial Services

10.8%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.8%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.1%
9.2%

Industrials

7.2%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.7%

Energy

3.2%
3.7%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.0%

Technology

BBUS
37.1%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

BBUS
10.8%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

BBUS
10.8%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.4%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

BBUS
8.1%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

BBUS
7.2%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.5%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

BBUS
3.2%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

BBUS
2.6%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.2%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBUSVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.48

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

3.37

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.44

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.92

15.88

-0.96

BBUS vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBUSVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.75

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.51

+0.33

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-55.45%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.92%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-19.30%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-25.36%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-8.03%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.93%

+0.07%

Volatility

BBUS vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.86%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

9.11%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

12.15%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.40%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

18.30%

+1.29%

BBUS vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBUS vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BBUS and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to BBUS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.80% vs 13.05% for VTI. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.80% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for VTI.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.97% for BBUS.

BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer