GSSC vs. ISCG
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - GSSC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index while ISCG tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 7.20%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for ISCG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCG.
Performance
GSSC vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSSC having a 13.55% return and ISCG slightly lower at 12.92%.
GSSC
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ISCG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
GSSC vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 13.55% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.24% | 8.77% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 12.92% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and ISCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GSSC and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
ISCG
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
GSSC
ISCG
Financial Services
GSSC
ISCG
Healthcare
GSSC
ISCG
Technology
GSSC
ISCG
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
ISCG
Energy
GSSC
ISCG
Real Estate
GSSC
ISCG
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
ISCG
Basic Materials
GSSC
ISCG
Communication Services
GSSC
ISCG
Utilities
GSSC
ISCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
ISCG
GSSC vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSSC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.69 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 10.31 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSSC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.23 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.41 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and ISCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -57.72% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -11.43% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -26.71% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -37.80% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.93% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -11.63% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.98% | +0.18% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 4.93%. This indicates that GSSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 4.93% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 13.09% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 18.13% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 22.95% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 23.16% | -0.14% |
GSSC vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSSC vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than ISCG's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.07% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GSSC and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSSC has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to ISCG (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs ISCG's -57.72%.
On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 7.20% vs 5.31% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSSC.
GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.56% for ISCG.
GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.06% for ISCG.
ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and ISCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer