GSSC vs. VTI
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 7.65%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
GSSC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return.
GSSC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
GSSC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 17.97% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.24% | 8.39% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.82% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 10.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and VTI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GSSC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
VTI
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
GSSC
VTI
Industrials
GSSC
VTI
Healthcare
GSSC
VTI
Financial Services
GSSC
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
VTI
Energy
GSSC
VTI
Real Estate
GSSC
VTI
Basic Materials
GSSC
VTI
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
VTI
Communication Services
GSSC
VTI
Utilities
GSSC
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
VTI
GSSC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSSC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.73 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | 12.14 | -1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -55.45% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -8.92% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -19.30% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -25.36% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.85% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.01% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.00% | +1.15% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.95%. This indicates that GSSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 4.95% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 10.05% | +3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 12.83% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 17.51% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 18.32% | +4.68% |
GSSC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSSC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, which matches VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSSC and VTI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSSC has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to VTI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 11.90% vs 7.65% for GSSC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSSC.
GSSC and VTI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.03%.
GSSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer