GSSC vs. VOO
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 8.08%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
GSSC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.
GSSC
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 18.44%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
GSSC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 18.44% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.24% | 8.39% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 10.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GSSC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
VOO
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
GSSC
VOO
Industrials
GSSC
VOO
Healthcare
GSSC
VOO
Financial Services
GSSC
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
VOO
Energy
GSSC
VOO
Real Estate
GSSC
VOO
Basic Materials
GSSC
VOO
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
VOO
Communication Services
GSSC
VOO
Utilities
GSSC
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
VOO
GSSC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSSC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.02 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 13.58 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -33.99% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -8.90% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -18.69% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -24.52% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.74% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -3.68% | -5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.98% | +1.17% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that GSSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 4.60% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 9.73% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 12.39% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 16.90% | +4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 18.05% | +4.96% |
GSSC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSSC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, which matches VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSSC and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSSC has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.58% vs 8.08% for GSSC. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSSC.
GSSC and VOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.03%.
GSSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer