PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIE vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIE vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than IDEV's 8.92% return.


GSIE

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
9.50%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.08%

IDEV

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.23%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.57%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIE vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
6.51%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%18.03%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
8.92%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and IDEV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.98

The correlation between GSIE and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSIE vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSIE
IDEV

Financial Services

27.1%
24.2%

Industrials

18.0%
19.1%

Technology

9.5%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
6.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%
8.0%

Energy

4.4%
5.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
4.0%

Utilities

3.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.9%

Financial Services

GSIE
27.1%
IDEV
24.2%

Industrials

GSIE
18.0%
IDEV
19.1%

Technology

GSIE
9.5%
IDEV
9.9%

Healthcare

GSIE
9.1%
IDEV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSIE
9.1%
IDEV
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

GSIE
7.2%
IDEV
6.0%

Basic Materials

GSIE
5.8%
IDEV
8.0%

Energy

GSIE
4.4%
IDEV
5.9%

Communication Services

GSIE
3.8%
IDEV
4.0%

Utilities

GSIE
3.2%
IDEV
3.7%

Real Estate

GSIE
1.2%
IDEV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIE vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIE vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIEIDEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.08

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

8.16

-1.29

GSIE vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIEIDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.61

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.52

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.55

-0.03

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, roughly equal to the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIEIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-34.77%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-11.20%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-13.41%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-29.15%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.98%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-6.57%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.85%

-0.03%

Volatility

GSIE vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIEIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.60%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

12.10%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

14.51%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

16.26%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

17.27%

-0.52%

GSIE vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIE vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than IDEV's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.52%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.13%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GSIE and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IDEV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to GSIE (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.48% vs 8.04% for GSIE. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.52% for GSIE.

GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.05% for IDEV.

IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIE and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer