IDEV vs. IEFA
IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) and IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index while IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDEV returned 9.19%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for IEFA. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IDEV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IEFA.
Performance
IDEV vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IDEV having a 10.38% return and IEFA slightly higher at 10.65%.
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
IDEV vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 10.38% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.43% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 10.65% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 17.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEV and IEFA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IDEV and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDEV vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDEV
IEFA
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IDEV
IEFA
Industrials
IDEV
IEFA
Technology
IDEV
IEFA
Healthcare
IDEV
IEFA
Basic Materials
IDEV
IEFA
Consumer Cyclical
IDEV
IEFA
Consumer Defensive
IDEV
IEFA
Energy
IDEV
IEFA
Communication Services
IDEV
IEFA
Utilities
IDEV
IEFA
Real Estate
IDEV
IEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEV vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
IDEV
IEFA
IDEV vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDEV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.23 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 8.48 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDEV vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, roughly equal to the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -34.78% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -11.50% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -13.76% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -30.41% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -6.67% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.02% | -0.16% |
Volatility
IDEV vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) have volatilities of 4.70% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 4.85% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 13.07% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 15.44% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 16.59% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 17.27% | +0.01% |
IDEV vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDEV vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than IEFA's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.20% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.38% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IDEV and IEFA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to IDEV (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs IEFA's -34.78%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 9.19% vs 8.87% for IEFA. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IEFA.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 3.20% for IDEV.
IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.07% for IEFA.
IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEV and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer