GSIE vs. GEMD
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD).
GSIE and GEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2015. GEMD is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets USD Bond Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. Both GSIE and GEMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GSIE vs. GEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIE vs. GEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 0.78% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -11.81% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | -1.61% | 13.67% | 3.31% | 8.51% | -15.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than GEMD's -1.61% return.
GSIE
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
GEMD
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIE vs. GEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GEMD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSIE vs. GEMD — Risk / Return Rank
GSIE
GEMD
GSIE vs. GEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIE | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 1.96 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 1.99 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 8.28 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIE | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.13 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIE and GEMD is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GSIE vs. GEMD - Dividend Comparison
GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than GEMD's 6.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.66% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.47% | 6.32% | 5.79% | 5.70% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSIE vs. GEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, which is greater than GEMD's maximum drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and GEMD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIE | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -24.56% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -4.64% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.45% | -3.61% | -3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -8.48% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 1.11% | +1.65% |
Volatility
GSIE vs. GEMD - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) at 3.00%. This indicates that GSIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIE | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 3.00% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 4.14% | +6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 6.52% | +11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 10.08% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 10.08% | +6.62% |