GEMD vs. BEMB
GEMD (Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) and BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. GEMD is passively managed, while BEMB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GEMD returned 8.14%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for BEMB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GEMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BEMB.
Performance
GEMD vs. BEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEMD achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than BEMB's 1.56% return.
GEMD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEMB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEMD vs. BEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 2.26% | 13.67% | 3.31% | 6.83% |
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.56% | 12.27% | 5.51% | 8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEMD and BEMB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GEMD and BEMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEMD vs. BEMB — Risk / Return Rank
GEMD
BEMB
GEMD vs. BEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) and Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEMD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.43 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 10.44 | -0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEMD vs. BEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEMD drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, which is greater than BEMB's maximum drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMD and BEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEMD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -6.17% | -18.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -3.67% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.69% | -6.17% | -1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.45% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -0.93% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.85% | +0.25% |
Volatility
GEMD vs. BEMB - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) at 1.35%. This indicates that GEMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEMD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 1.35% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.59% | 3.57% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 4.35% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 5.87% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 5.87% | +4.05% |
GEMD vs. BEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMB's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEMD vs. BEMB - Dividend Comparison
GEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than BEMB's 6.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.86% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% | 0.00% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 5.65% | 6.32% | 5.79% | 5.70% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GEMD and BEMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GEMD has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to BEMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEMD dropped -24.56% vs BEMB's -6.17%.
On 3-year performance, BEMB leads with 8.46% vs 8.14% for GEMD. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BEMB has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GEMD.
BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.86%, compared with 5.65% for GEMD.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GEMD and 0.18% for BEMB.
BEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEMD and BEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer