GSIE vs. CIL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSIE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSIE returned 9.54%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for CIL. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GSIE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

GSIE vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIE has outperformed CIL with an annualized return of 9.54%, while CIL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.

GSIE

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 2.31%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 1Y: 24.11%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 9.54%
• ALL TIME*: 9.02%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	$17.78M	$19.71M	$20.28M

GSIE vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	11.28%	32.53%	5.23%	16.99%	-15.86%	13.27%	7.45%	22.83%	-13.40%	26.22%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and CIL is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015	0.74

The correlation between GSIE and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.85 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSIE vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSIE	CIL
Financial Services	27.3%	24.8%
Industrials	18.6%	18.4%
Technology	10.6%	6.4%
Healthcare	9.6%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	8.8%
Basic Materials	5.4%	6.6%
Energy	4.2%	4.6%
Communication Services	3.8%	5.8%
Utilities	3.3%	6.6%
Real Estate	1.2%	2.2%

Return for Risk

GSIE vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSIE

GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 70
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 93
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSIE vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSIE	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.51	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	3.80	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.67	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	3.69	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	18.41	-9.91

GSIE vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIE	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.63%	-36.27%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-4.60%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.07%	-11.29%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.97%	-29.89%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.63%	-36.27%	+1.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.58%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-6.47%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.03%	+1.77%

Volatility

GSIE vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that GSIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSIE	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	0.00%	+4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.49%	2.31%	+10.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.58%	6.80%	+7.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	16.39%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	16.74%	-0.23%

GSIE vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSIE vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.05%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	2.50%	2.65%	3.11%	2.87%	3.01%	2.40%	1.60%	2.80%	2.68%	2.31%	2.15%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSIE and CIL in my portfolio?

GSIE and CIL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSIE or CIL?

GSIE has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, GSIE or CIL?

On 10-year performance, GSIE leads with 9.54% vs 8.18% for CIL. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSIE or CIL?

Over the 10-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSIE or CIL?

GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSIE or CIL?

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

What is the main difference between GSIE and CIL?

GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.