CIL vs. VXUS
CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIL returned 8.21%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for VXUS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
CIL vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIL achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 16.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CIL has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 8.21%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
CIL vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | 3.76% | 16.29% | -16.00% | 11.07% | 7.21% | 19.13% | -13.34% | 27.67% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 16.04% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIL and VXUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CIL and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CIL vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIL
VXUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
CIL
VXUS
Industrials
CIL
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
CIL
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
CIL
VXUS
Healthcare
CIL
VXUS
Utilities
CIL
VXUS
Basic Materials
CIL
VXUS
Technology
CIL
VXUS
Communication Services
CIL
VXUS
Energy
CIL
VXUS
Real Estate
CIL
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIL vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
CIL
VXUS
CIL vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 3.07 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.66 | 11.84 | +5.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIL vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIL drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIL and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -35.97% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -11.27% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -13.58% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -29.44% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -35.97% | -0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -8.20% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 2.92% | -1.85% |
Volatility
CIL vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is 0.00%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that CIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 6.28% | -6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.38% | 14.10% | -10.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.68% | 16.08% | -8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 16.21% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 17.18% | -0.10% |
CIL vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIL vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than VXUS's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.20% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.51% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIL and VXUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIL dropped -36.27% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.57% vs 8.21% for CIL. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.20% for CIL.
CIL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CIL and 0.05% for VXUS.
CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIL and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer