GSGO vs. GSEW
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Goldman Sachs. GSGO is actively managed, while GSEW is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSEW.
Performance
GSGO vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSGO having a 8.99% return and GSEW slightly lower at 8.86%.
GSGO
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GSGO vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 8.99% | 1.36% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.86% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and GSEW is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
GSEW
GSGO vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSGO | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.61 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and GSEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -38.65% | +24.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.79% | -1.58% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -5.89% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 12.25% | +6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 16.93% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 19.20% | -0.74% |
GSGO vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.43% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% |
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSGO and GSEW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.
GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.09% for GSEW.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and GSEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer