GSGO vs. AAAU
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. GSGO is actively managed, while AAAU is passively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.
Performance
GSGO vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's -6.16% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AAAU
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -16.57%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 1Y
- 20.45%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.23M | $43.92M | $64.42M | |
| $292.33K | $361.30K | $297.31K |
GSGO vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 6.78% | 0.81% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -6.16% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and AAAU is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AAAU
GSGO vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSGO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -26.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -26.29% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -24.96% | +19.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -6.53% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.13% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 27.85% | -8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 18.32% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 17.24% | +2.45% |
GSGO vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSGO nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSGO and AAAU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.
GSGO and AAAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AAAU is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.18% for AAAU.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer