PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return.


GSEW

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.82%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.52%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.67%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and VV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017

0.91

The correlation between GSEW and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSEW vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
VV

Technology

20.9%
35.9%

Industrials

15.6%
8.0%

Financial Services

14.3%
11.8%

Healthcare

11.3%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.8%

Utilities

5.8%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.8%

Energy

4.9%
3.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.6%

Real Estate

4.0%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
11.2%

Technology

GSEW
20.9%
VV
35.9%

Industrials

GSEW
15.6%
VV
8.0%

Financial Services

GSEW
14.3%
VV
11.8%

Healthcare

GSEW
11.3%
VV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.1%
VV
9.8%

Utilities

GSEW
5.8%
VV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.7%
VV
4.8%

Energy

GSEW
4.9%
VV
3.6%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.6%
VV
1.6%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.0%
VV
1.7%

Communication Services

GSEW
3.5%
VV
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEWVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.03

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

13.86

-4.50

GSEW vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEWVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.33

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.79

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.59

+0.02

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-54.81%

+16.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-9.21%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-18.97%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-25.66%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.72%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-6.84%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.01%

+0.01%

Volatility

GSEW vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 2.76% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.84%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

8.98%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

11.99%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.22%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

18.19%

+1.01%

GSEW vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEW vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than VV's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and VV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.54% vs 8.63% for GSEW. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.98% for VV.

GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer