VV vs. SCHD
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VV returned 15.56%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
VV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 15.56%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.
VV
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
VV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 9.91% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.13% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and SCHD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VV and SCHD has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VV
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VV
SCHD
Financial Services
VV
SCHD
Communication Services
VV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
VV
SCHD
Healthcare
VV
SCHD
Industrials
VV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
VV
SCHD
Energy
VV
SCHD
Utilities
VV
SCHD
Real Estate
VV
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
VV
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
VV
SCHD
VV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 5.27 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 12.86 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -33.37% | -21.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -4.61% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -16.13% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -16.85% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | -33.37% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -2.95% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -3.31% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.89% | +0.18% |
Volatility
VV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that VV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.58% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 7.75% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 11.07% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 14.38% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 16.73% | +1.51% |
VV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.56% vs 12.48% for SCHD. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.98% for VV.
VV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer