PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 25.59% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.95%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.79% annualized return.


VV

1D
0.24%
1M
1.27%
6M
6.92%
YTD
8.88%
1Y
17.21%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
14.95%
ALL TIME*
10.94%

SCHD

1D
1.38%
1M
5.61%
6M
17.29%
YTD
25.59%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
12.79%
ALL TIME*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$688.17M$674.08M$669.05M
$75.39M$71.90M$96.35M

VV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
8.88%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
25.59%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and SCHD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between VV and SCHD has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
SCHD

Technology

39.1%
12.7%

Financial Services

11.5%
9.9%

Communication Services

9.7%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
7.7%

Healthcare

8.9%
20.8%

Industrials

8.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
20.6%

Energy

2.1%
14.1%

Utilities

2.0%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.2%

Technology

VV
39.1%
SCHD
12.7%

Financial Services

VV
11.5%
SCHD
9.9%

Communication Services

VV
9.7%
SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.0%
SCHD
7.7%

Healthcare

VV
8.9%
SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

VV
8.8%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.4%
SCHD
20.6%

Energy

VV
2.1%
SCHD
14.1%

Utilities

VV
2.0%
SCHD
0.1%

Real Estate

VV
1.6%
SCHD

-

Basic Materials

VV
1.5%
SCHD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

6.35

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

15.78

-7.82

VV vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-33.37%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-4.61%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-16.13%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-16.85%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-33.37%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

0.00%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-3.30%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.86%

+0.31%

Volatility

VV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is 3.11%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that VV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.98%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

8.01%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

11.14%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

14.39%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

16.73%

+1.47%

VV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SCHD's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.09%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


VV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to VV (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 14.95% vs 12.79% for SCHD. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.03% for VV.

VV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer