GSEW vs. GMUN

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GMUN (Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while GMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GMUN.

Performance

GSEW vs. GMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSEW

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 1.77%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 1Y: 15.89%
• 3Y*: 15.53%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: —

GMUN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. GMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	11.56%	11.97%	16.89%	12.89%
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF	-0.34%	5.92%	0.31%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and GMUN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023	0.14

Return for Risk

GSEW vs. GMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW

GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 49
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

GMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. GMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSEW	GMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEW	GMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSEW	GMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.30%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.11%	—	—

GSEW vs. GMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GMUN's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSEW vs. GMUN - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while GMUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF	2.87%	2.94%	3.22%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	1.38%	1.52%	1.46%	1.64%	1.74%	1.34%	1.53%	1.66%	1.56%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEW and GMUN in my portfolio?

GSEW and GMUN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSEW or GMUN?

On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEW or GMUN?

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GMUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEW or GMUN?

GMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.38% for GSEW.

What is the main difference between GSEW and GMUN?

GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GMUN is Municipal Bonds. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while GMUN tracks Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.15% for GMUN.