GMUN vs. PUSH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH).

GMUN and PUSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMUN is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index. It was launched on Mar 7, 2023. PUSH is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024.

Performance

GMUN vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GMUN vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF	-0.23%	5.92%	1.75%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	0.65%	4.16%	1.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMUN achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than PUSH's 0.65% return.

GMUN

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: 2.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PUSH

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUN vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMUN and PUSH have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GMUN

Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF

PUSH

PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

GMUN vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUN

GMUN Risk / Return Rank: 75
GMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 95
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUN vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMUN	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.21	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.22	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.59	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	4.40	-2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	15.49	-8.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMUN vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PUSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMUN and PUSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMUN	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	2.21	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	2.84	-1.78

Correlation

The correlation between GMUN and PUSH is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GMUN vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

GMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than PUSH's 3.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF	3.08%	2.94%	3.22%	2.20%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.31%	3.45%	1.86%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GMUN vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMUN drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUN and PUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMUN	PUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-0.85%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-0.85%	-1.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-0.36%	-1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-0.11%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.24%	+0.58%

Volatility

GMUN vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.23%. This indicates that GMUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMUN	PUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	0.23%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.62%	1.03%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09%	1.64%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.95%	1.33%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.95%	1.33%	+1.62%