PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. GDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than GDOC's -7.76% return.


GSEW

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.82%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*

GDOC

1D
0.41%
1M
1.93%
YTD
-7.76%
6M
-9.87%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
0.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.52%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%0.03%
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
-7.76%10.74%-1.66%4.60%-17.12%-2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and GDOC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021

0.75

The correlation between GSEW and GDOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSEW vs. GDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
GDOC

Technology

20.9%

-

Industrials

15.6%

-

Financial Services

14.3%

-

Healthcare

11.3%
97.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%

-

Utilities

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
1.0%

Energy

4.9%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Technology

GSEW
20.9%
GDOC

-

Industrials

GSEW
15.6%
GDOC

-

Financial Services

GSEW
14.3%
GDOC

-

Healthcare

GSEW
11.3%
GDOC
97.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.1%
GDOC

-

Utilities

GSEW
5.8%
GDOC

-

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.7%
GDOC
1.0%

Energy

GSEW
4.9%
GDOC

-

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.6%
GDOC

-

Real Estate

GSEW
4.0%
GDOC

-

Communication Services

GSEW
3.5%
GDOC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GDOC
GDOC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEWGDOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.07

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.33

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

0.76

+8.59

GSEW vs. GDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the GDOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and GDOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEWGDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

0.33

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.19

+0.81

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than GDOC's maximum drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and GDOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWGDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-31.01%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-15.67%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-22.51%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-15.53%

+14.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-15.90%

+10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

6.83%

-4.81%

Volatility

GSEW vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.76%, while Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWGDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.90%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

11.61%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

15.64%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

18.79%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

18.79%

+0.41%

GSEW vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEW vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than GDOC's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
0.35%0.32%0.02%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and GDOC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDOC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs GDOC's -31.01%.

On 3-year performance, GSEW leads with 17.43% vs 0.05% for GDOC. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 17.43% return vs 0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.35% for GDOC.

GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GDOC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.75% for GDOC.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and GDOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer