GSEW vs. GDOC
GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while GDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. GSEW is passively managed, while GDOC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSEW returned 17.43%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for GDOC. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GDOC.
Performance
GSEW vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than GDOC's -7.76% return.
GSEW
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
GDOC
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -9.87%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEW vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.52% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 0.03% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -7.76% | 10.74% | -1.66% | 4.60% | -17.12% | -2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and GDOC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between GSEW and GDOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GSEW vs. GDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEW
GDOC
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
GSEW
GDOC
-
Industrials
GSEW
GDOC
-
Financial Services
GSEW
GDOC
-
Healthcare
GSEW
GDOC
Consumer Cyclical
GSEW
GDOC
-
Utilities
GSEW
GDOC
-
Consumer Defensive
GSEW
GDOC
Energy
GSEW
GDOC
-
Basic Materials
GSEW
GDOC
-
Real Estate
GSEW
GDOC
-
Communication Services
GSEW
GDOC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
GDOC
GSEW vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEW | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.07 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.33 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 0.76 | +8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEW | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.33 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | -0.19 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than GDOC's maximum drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and GDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -31.01% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -15.67% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -22.51% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -15.53% | +14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -15.90% | +10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 6.83% | -4.81% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.76%, while Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 4.90% | -2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 11.61% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 15.64% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 18.79% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 18.79% | +0.41% |
GSEW vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEW vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than GDOC's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEW and GDOC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDOC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs GDOC's -31.01%.
On 3-year performance, GSEW leads with 17.43% vs 0.05% for GDOC. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 17.43% return vs 0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.
GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.35% for GDOC.
GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GDOC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.75% for GDOC.
GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEW and GDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer