GDOC vs. AGNG
GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) and AGNG (Global X Aging Population ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GDOC is actively managed, while AGNG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDOC returned 0.91%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for AGNG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDOC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AGNG.
Performance
GDOC vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDOC achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than AGNG's -3.52% return.
GDOC
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -6.35%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGNG
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
GDOC vs. AGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -5.08% | 10.74% | -1.66% | 4.60% | -17.12% | -2.73% |
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | -3.52% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | -2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOC and AGNG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GDOC and AGNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
GDOC vs. AGNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDOC
AGNG
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GDOC
AGNG
Consumer Defensive
GDOC
AGNG
-
Basic Materials
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Communication Services
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Energy
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Financial Services
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Industrials
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Real Estate
GDOC
-
AGNG
Technology
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Utilities
GDOC
-
AGNG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOC vs. AGNG — Risk / Return Rank
GDOC
AGNG
GDOC vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOC | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.07 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 2.64 | -1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOC vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, roughly equal to the maximum AGNG drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and AGNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOC | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -30.58% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | -11.45% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | -14.48% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.08% | -9.90% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -5.97% | -9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 4.65% | +2.49% |
Volatility
GDOC vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) at 4.28%. This indicates that GDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOC | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.28% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 10.27% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 13.70% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 15.22% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 17.14% | +1.63% |
GDOC vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOC vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison
GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than AGNG's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.91% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOC and AGNG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDOC has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to AGNG (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDOC dropped -31.01% vs AGNG's -30.58%.
On 3-year performance, AGNG leads with 8.61% vs 0.91% for GDOC. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGNG has performed better with a 8.61% return vs 0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.
AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.34% for GDOC.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GDOC and 0.50% for AGNG.
AGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDOC and AGNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer