GDOC vs. GERM
GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GDOC is actively managed, while GERM is passively managed. Over the past year, GDOC returned 8.39% vs 0.00% for GERM. GDOC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.
Performance
GDOC vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDOC
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -6.35%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDOC vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -5.08% | 10.74% | -11.29% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDOC vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDOC
GERM
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GDOC
GERM
Consumer Defensive
GDOC
GERM
-
Basic Materials
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Communication Services
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Energy
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Financial Services
GDOC
-
GERM
Industrials
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Real Estate
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Technology
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Utilities
GDOC
-
GERM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOC vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
GDOC
GERM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDOC vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOC | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOC vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOC | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | 0.00% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | 0.00% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.08% | 0.00% | -13.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | 0.00% | -15.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 0.00% | +7.14% |
Volatility
GDOC vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that GDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOC | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 0.00% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 0.00% | +12.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 0.00% | +15.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 0.00% | +18.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 0.00% | +18.77% |
GDOC vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOC vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOC has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDOC dropped -31.01% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, GDOC leads with 8.39% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDOC has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.
GDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GDOC and 0.68% for GERM.
Find the right allocation for GDOC and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer