EUSA vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUSA returned 11.57%/yr vs 18.74%/yr for SCHG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUSA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

EUSA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EUSA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.57%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.

EUSA

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 19.17%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 24.63%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 18.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	10.04%	10.24%	14.64%	17.72%	-17.13%	25.60%	15.03%	30.56%	-8.58%	19.02%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.78%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and SCHG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010	0.74

The correlation between EUSA and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUSA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUSA	SCHG
Technology	21.3%	46.3%
Industrials	14.7%	5.8%
Financial Services	14.4%	6.7%
Healthcare	10.1%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	12.7%
Utilities	5.6%	0.4%
Real Estate	5.5%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	1.7%
Communication Services	4.8%	16.0%
Energy	4.6%	0.8%
Basic Materials	4.1%	1.4%

Return for Risk

EUSA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA

EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 50
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUSA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.60	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.18	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	1.51	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.76	5.04	+4.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUSA vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUSA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.60	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.71	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.87	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.85	-0.14

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUSA	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-34.59%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.82%	-16.41%	+8.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.20%	-23.39%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.24%	-34.59%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-34.59%	-4.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.44%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-5.20%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	4.90%	-2.93%

Volatility

EUSA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 2.93%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUSA	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	3.61%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	11.62%	-2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	15.49%	-3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	22.26%	-5.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	21.55%	-3.21%

EUSA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EUSA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	1.51%	1.63%	1.47%	1.53%	1.73%	1.23%	1.45%	1.49%	2.01%	1.50%	1.59%	2.21%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUSA and SCHG in my portfolio?

EUSA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUSA or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to EUSA (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, EUSA or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.74% vs 11.57% for EUSA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUSA or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.74% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUSA or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUSA or SCHG?

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between EUSA and SCHG?

EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EUSA and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.