PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUSA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EUSA having a 9.00% return and VTI slightly lower at 8.82%. Over the past 10 years, EUSA has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.89%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


EUSA

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.15%
YTD
9.00%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
11.89%

VTI

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.71%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
9.00%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%19.02%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.82%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and VTI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010

0.84

The correlation between EUSA and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUSA vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUSA
VTI

Technology

20.3%
37.0%

Industrials

15.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

14.7%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.7%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.0%

Utilities

5.4%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.3%

Real Estate

5.2%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.8%

Energy

3.8%
3.3%

Technology

EUSA
20.3%
VTI
37.0%

Industrials

EUSA
15.3%
VTI
9.4%

Financial Services

EUSA
14.7%
VTI
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EUSA
11.1%
VTI
9.7%

Healthcare

EUSA
10.8%
VTI
9.0%

Utilities

EUSA
5.4%
VTI
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

EUSA
5.3%
VTI
4.3%

Real Estate

EUSA
5.2%
VTI
2.3%

Basic Materials

EUSA
4.3%
VTI
1.9%

Communication Services

EUSA
4.0%
VTI
9.8%

Energy

EUSA
3.8%
VTI
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUSAVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.73

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

12.14

-3.50

EUSA vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSAVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-55.45%

+16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-8.92%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-19.30%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-25.36%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-35.00%

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-2.85%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-8.01%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.00%

-0.02%

Volatility

EUSA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 3.78%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUSAVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.95%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

10.05%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

12.83%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

17.51%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

18.32%

0.00%

EUSA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUSA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.48%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUSA and VTI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to EUSA (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 11.89% for EUSA. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EUSA.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EUSA and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUSA and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer