GSCYX vs. GGBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX).
GSCYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 27, 2001. GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001.
Performance
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund | -0.47% | 6.03% | 10.58% | 14.91% | -17.84% | 22.04% | 20.07% | 25.28% | -12.62% | 13.12% |
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -3.27% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than GGBZX's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has underperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.
GSCYX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 15.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
GGBZX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GGBZX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSCYX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank
GSCYX
GGBZX
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSCYX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.98 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.45 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 5.95 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSCYX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.98 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.45 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.63 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.38 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSCYX and GGBZX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison
GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.36%, less than GGBZX's 11.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund | 11.36% | 11.30% | 6.14% | 2.65% | 5.13% | 16.30% | 1.07% | 3.87% | 24.79% | 7.81% | 1.46% | 6.08% |
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 11.96% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
Drawdowns
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than GGBZX's maximum drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and GGBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSCYX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.53% | -57.68% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -11.75% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.95% | -28.31% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.83% | -33.03% | -7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -7.31% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -9.29% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.69% | +0.99% |
Volatility
GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) at 6.24%. This indicates that GSCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSCYX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 6.24% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 9.83% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 16.64% | +5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 15.39% | +8.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 16.42% | +6.89% |