GSCYX vs. GGBZX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSCYX (GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund) and GGBZX (GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - GSCYX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GGBZX is a Global Equities fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX returned 10.08%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for GGBZX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSCYX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGBZX.

Performance

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly higher than GGBZX's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has underperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return.

GSCYX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 13.67%
• 6M: 15.06%
• 1Y: 29.52%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

GGBZX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.88%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: 25.25%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: 11.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund	13.67%	6.03%	10.58%	14.91%	-17.84%	22.04%	20.07%	25.28%	-12.62%	13.12%
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.82%	19.62%	15.45%	20.67%	-19.61%	14.95%	15.47%	26.93%	-10.15%	25.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCYX and GGBZX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002	0.88

The correlation between GSCYX and GGBZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSCYX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCYX

GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

GGBZX

GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 49
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSCYX	GGBZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.08	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.88	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.38	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	2.57	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	11.18	-1.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the GGBZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCYX and GGBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSCYX	GGBZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	2.08	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.58	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.70	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.41	-0.20

Drawdowns

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than GGBZX's maximum drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and GGBZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSCYX	GGBZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.53%	-57.68%	-5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-10.02%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.51%	-16.21%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.95%	-28.31%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.83%	-33.03%	-7.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.16%	-9.24%	-5.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.30%	+0.67%

Volatility

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) at 3.61%. This indicates that GSCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSCYX	GGBZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	3.61%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	9.95%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	12.56%	+5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.51%	15.45%	+8.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	16.46%	+6.87%

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GGBZX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSCYX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison

GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, less than GGBZX's 10.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.44%	11.57%	3.37%	3.51%	13.16%	7.72%	6.01%	12.14%	3.94%	7.18%	9.55%	27.06%
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund	9.94%	11.30%	6.14%	2.65%	5.13%	16.30%	1.07%	3.87%	24.79%	7.81%	1.46%	6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSCYX and GGBZX in my portfolio?

GSCYX and GGBZX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSCYX or GGBZX?

GSCYX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to GGBZX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs GGBZX's -57.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGBZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.