PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSCYX vs. GFSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 2.67% return.


GSCYX

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.15%
6M
10.92%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
5.00%

GFSYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.10%
6M
3.25%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
16.26%6.03%10.58%14.91%-17.84%22.04%20.07%25.28%-12.62%7.83%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
2.67%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%0.14%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCYX and GFSYX is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017

0.11

The correlation between GSCYX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSCYX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSCYX
GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSCYXGFSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

4.84

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

12.21

-3.84

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCYX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and GFSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCYXGFSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.53%

-9.54%

-53.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-1.34%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.51%

-4.49%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-4.49%

-29.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

0.00%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-0.90%

-14.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

0.53%

+2.47%

Volatility

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.70%. This indicates that GSCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCYXGFSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

0.70%

+3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

1.93%

+11.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

2.55%

+15.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

3.67%

+19.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

3.70%

+19.59%

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSCYX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than GFSYX's 6.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
6.99%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%0.00%0.00%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
9.72%11.30%6.14%2.65%5.13%16.30%1.07%3.87%24.79%7.81%1.46%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSCYX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSCYX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to GFSYX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

GFSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSCYX and GFSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer