PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSCYX vs. GLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly higher than GLDYX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


GSCYX

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.27%
YTD
13.67%
6M
15.06%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
10.08%

GLDYX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
13.67%6.03%10.58%14.91%-17.84%22.04%20.07%25.28%-12.62%13.12%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.65%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCYX and GLDYX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

-0.10

The correlation between GSCYX and GLDYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSCYX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCYX
GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCYXGLDYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.90

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

4.72

-2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.69

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.94

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.85

16.47

-6.62

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCYX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCYXGLDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.90

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

1.17

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

1.47

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.66

-0.45

Drawdowns

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and GLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCYXGLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.53%

-11.73%

-51.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-1.04%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.51%

-1.04%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-6.68%

-27.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

-6.68%

-34.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.10%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.16%

-2.16%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.25%

+2.72%

Volatility

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.44%. This indicates that GSCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCYXGLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

0.44%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

1.01%

+11.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

1.39%

+16.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

1.82%

+21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.33%

1.55%

+21.78%

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSCYX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than GLDYX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.10%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
9.94%11.30%6.14%2.65%5.13%16.30%1.07%3.87%24.79%7.81%1.46%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSCYX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSCYX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to GLDYX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSCYX and GLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer