GSBFX vs. GLEIX
GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and GLEIX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - GSBFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GLEIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GSBFX returned 5.61%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for GLEIX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLEIX.
Performance
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSBFX achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than GLEIX's 23.92% return.
GSBFX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 12.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
GLEIX
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- 23.92%
- 6M
- 24.21%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.51%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund | 5.53% | 10.42% | 9.32% | 9.64% | -9.53% | 10.50% | 9.53% | 19.38% | -4.92% | 0.65% |
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 23.92% | 5.30% | 58.18% | 15.08% | 18.96% | 38.31% | -17.46% | 16.95% | -15.17% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSBFX and GLEIX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GSBFX and GLEIX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSBFX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSBFX
GLEIX
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSBFX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 3.84 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | 9.03 | +3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum GLEIX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and GLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSBFX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -59.27% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | -7.29% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | -17.07% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.94% | -21.89% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -4.45% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -8.51% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 3.09% | -2.07% |
Volatility
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) is 1.98%, while Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that GSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSBFX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 5.56% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | 11.33% | -6.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 14.76% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 20.58% | -13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.97% | 25.42% | -17.45% |
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSBFX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison
GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than GLEIX's 8.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 8.07% | 10.00% | 25.43% | 10.22% | 4.70% | 8.41% | 4.17% | 4.83% | 3.54% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund | 5.07% | 4.39% | 5.12% | 3.41% | 4.10% | 6.66% | 3.05% | 3.52% | 3.98% | 3.52% | 3.78% | 3.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSBFX and GLEIX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLEIX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to GSBFX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.
GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSBFX and GLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer