PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLEIX vs. DHIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLEIX achieves a 23.46% return, which is significantly higher than DHIVX's 12.48% return.


GLEIX

1D
1.58%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
23.46%
6M
23.38%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
32.59%
5Y*
23.61%
10Y*

DHIVX

1D
1.31%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
12.48%
6M
12.57%
1Y
16.50%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
23.46%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-3.42%
DHIVX
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund
12.48%16.30%20.25%5.34%-3.28%7.51%-7.17%25.27%-4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GLEIX and DHIVX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.70

The correlation between GLEIX and DHIVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLEIX vs. DHIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DHIVX
DHIVX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DHIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DHIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLEIXDHIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.73

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

7.86

+1.45

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DHIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLEIX and DHIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLEIXDHIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.67

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.77

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.57

+0.04

Drawdowns

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLEIX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than DHIVX's maximum drawdown of -36.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEIX and DHIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLEIXDHIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-36.18%

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-4.37%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-9.92%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-20.41%

-1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-2.29%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-5.59%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.08%

+0.77%

Volatility

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX) at 3.28%. This indicates that GLEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLEIXDHIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

3.28%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

7.72%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

9.79%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

12.36%

+8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

14.68%

+10.79%

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLEIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DHIVX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLEIX vs. DHIVX - Dividend Comparison

GLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, more than DHIVX's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHIVX
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund
3.50%3.66%2.54%1.60%1.85%1.70%2.43%2.31%2.45%0.00%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.10%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLEIX and DHIVX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLEIX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to DHIVX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLEIX dropped -59.27% vs DHIVX's -36.18%.

GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLEIX and DHIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer