GSBFX vs. INPFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and INPFX (American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX returned 6.97%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for INPFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for INPFX.

Performance

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSBFX having a 4.73% return and INPFX slightly lower at 4.70%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSBFX having a 6.97% annualized return and INPFX not far ahead at 7.23%.

GSBFX

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 4.73%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 13.36%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: 5.47%
• 10Y*: 6.97%

INPFX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 4.70%
• 6M: 5.61%
• 1Y: 13.77%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: 6.40%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	4.73%	10.42%	9.32%	9.64%	-9.53%	10.50%	9.53%	19.38%	-4.92%	7.94%
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	4.70%	14.29%	9.20%	9.46%	-8.74%	12.90%	5.67%	15.76%	-3.57%	11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and INPFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012	0.93

The correlation between GSBFX and INPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. INPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX

GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

INPFX

INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 61
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSBFX	INPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.38	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	3.41	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.46	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	2.73	+0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.71	11.64	+2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the INPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and INPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSBFX	INPFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.38	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.85	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.87	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.93	-0.23

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than INPFX's maximum drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and INPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSBFX	INPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-21.31%	-15.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-5.20%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	-7.02%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-15.37%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.42%	-21.31%	-2.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.20%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-2.30%	-1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.22%	-0.20%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) is 1.71%, while American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that GSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSBFX	INPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	1.82%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	4.74%	-0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.48%	5.93%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	7.53%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	8.36%	-0.37%

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than INPFX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSBFX vs. INPFX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than INPFX's 5.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.11%	4.39%	5.12%	3.41%	4.10%	6.66%	3.05%	3.52%	3.98%	3.52%	3.78%	3.93%
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	5.29%	5.61%	5.15%	4.76%	4.84%	4.38%	5.54%	4.53%	4.79%	3.25%	3.53%	3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSBFX and INPFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GSBFX and INPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSBFX or INPFX?

INPFX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to GSBFX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs INPFX's -21.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.