GSBFX vs. USBLX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and USBLX (USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX returned 7.08%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for USBLX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for USBLX.

Performance

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBFX achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than USBLX's 6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX has underperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.

GSBFX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 5.70%
• 1Y: 13.68%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: 5.82%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

USBLX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 16.95%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.68%	10.42%	9.32%	9.64%	-9.53%	10.50%	9.53%	19.38%	-4.92%	7.94%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	6.39%	10.30%	13.32%	16.10%	-15.82%	14.80%	10.78%	18.46%	-1.95%	13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and USBLX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995	0.89

The correlation between GSBFX and USBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX

GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

USBLX

USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 83
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSBFX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.59	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.68	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	3.22	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.45	15.48	-2.04

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than USBLX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and USBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSBFX	USBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-33.49%	-3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-5.24%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	-11.66%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-20.51%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.42%	-21.93%	-1.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.29%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-4.29%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.09%	-0.07%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) is 2.02%, while USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that GSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSBFX	USBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	2.40%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.68%	5.26%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.72%	6.50%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.44%	8.69%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.00%	9.11%	-1.11%

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSBFX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than USBLX's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.07%	4.39%	5.12%	3.41%	4.10%	6.66%	3.05%	3.52%	3.98%	3.52%	3.78%	3.93%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	2.24%	1.96%	2.28%	2.11%	1.74%	1.66%	1.88%	1.95%	2.73%	2.16%	2.31%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSBFX and USBLX in my portfolio?

GSBFX and USBLX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSBFX or USBLX?

USBLX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to GSBFX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.