PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLEIX vs. BGLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLEIX achieves a 23.46% return, which is significantly higher than BGLYX's 8.61% return.


GLEIX

1D
1.58%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
23.46%
6M
23.38%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
32.59%
5Y*
23.61%
10Y*

BGLYX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
23.46%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-15.17%6.98%
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.61%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%16.13%-3.25%25.44%-8.06%1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GLEIX and BGLYX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.63

The correlation between GLEIX and BGLYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLEIX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLEIXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.31

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

1.88

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.19

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.31

7.21

+2.10

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the BGLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLEIX and BGLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLEIXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.31

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.51

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.48

+0.13

Drawdowns

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLEIX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEIX and BGLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLEIXBGLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-36.54%

-22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-6.32%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-14.56%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-20.94%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-4.48%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-7.85%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

1.92%

+0.93%

Volatility

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) at 3.58%. This indicates that GLEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLEIXBGLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

3.58%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

8.55%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

10.54%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

13.60%

+7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

15.64%

+9.83%

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLEIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLEIX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison

GLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, less than BGLYX's 28.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.53%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.10%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLEIX and BGLYX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLEIX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to BGLYX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLEIX dropped -59.27% vs BGLYX's -36.54%.

GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLEIX and BGLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer