GLEIX vs. MLPA
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA).
GLEIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Sep 28, 2017. MLPA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2012.
Performance
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 23.69% | 5.30% | 58.18% | 15.08% | 18.96% | 38.31% | -17.46% | 16.95% | -15.17% | 6.98% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 12.65% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | 3.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLEIX achieves a 23.69% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 12.65% return.
GLEIX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 23.69%
- 6M
- 23.12%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 33.51%
- 5Y*
- 27.34%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.45%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLEIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLEIX vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank
GLEIX
MLPA
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLEIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.47 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 0.71 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.61 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 1.51 | +2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLEIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.47 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.34 | 1.01 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.16 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLEIX and MLPA is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison
GLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than MLPA's 7.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 8.08% | 10.00% | 25.43% | 10.22% | 4.70% | 8.41% | 4.17% | 4.83% | 3.54% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.20% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Drawdowns
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLEIX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEIX and MLPA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLEIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -78.75% | +19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -14.20% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.89% | -18.75% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -3.55% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -20.49% | +11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 5.73% | -0.74% |
Volatility
GLEIX vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 3.40%. This indicates that GLEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLEIX | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.40% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 7.96% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 16.10% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 18.40% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 27.64% | -2.05% |