GSAT vs. BTU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU).

Performance

GSAT vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSAT vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSAT Globalstar, Inc.	8.81%	96.59%	6.70%	45.86%	14.66%	242.59%	-34.88%	-18.71%	-51.17%	-20.12%
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation	11.19%	44.18%	-12.80%	-7.03%	162.36%	317.84%	-73.57%	-67.32%	-21.62%	27.00%

Fundamentals

EPS GSAT : -$0.11 BTU : -$0.27
PS Ratio GSAT : 30.96 BTU : 1.01
Total Revenue (TTM) GSAT : $272.99M BTU : $3.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) GSAT : $110.67M BTU : $434.90M
EBITDA (TTM) GSAT : $110.23M BTU : $453.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAT achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than BTU's 11.19% return.

GSAT

• 1D: 7.44%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 8.81%
• 6M: 82.52%
• 1Y: 218.41%
• 3Y*: 56.28%
• 5Y*: 26.08%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

BTU

• 1D: -7.65%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 24.83%
• 1Y: 146.59%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 62.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GSAT vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAT

GSAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
GSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BTU

BTU Risk / Return Rank: 91
BTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BTU Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BTU Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAT vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSAT	BTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	2.33	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.81	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.33	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.99	5.56	+2.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.70	12.94	+5.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSAT vs. BTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAT Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAT and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSAT	BTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	2.33	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.89	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.03	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between GSAT and BTU is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GSAT vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

GSAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GSAT Globalstar, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation	0.91%	1.01%	1.43%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	26.43%	1.59%

Drawdowns

GSAT vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAT drawdown since its inception was -99.14%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAT and BTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSAT	BTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.14%	-98.07%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.53%	-25.83%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.54%	-67.44%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.73%	-20.44%	-54.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.59%	-48.39%	-40.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.34%	11.09%	+0.25%

Volatility

GSAT vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) have volatilities of 22.22% and 22.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSAT	BTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.22%	22.06%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.36%	42.29%	+13.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.58%	63.44%	+8.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.16%	70.82%	+13.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.78%	78.13%	+14.65%

Financials

GSAT vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Globalstar, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GSAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Globalstar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 71.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.30M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.1%.

GSAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Globalstar, Inc. reported an operating income of -371.00K and revenue of 71.96M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

BTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of -26.10M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.6%.

GSAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Globalstar, Inc. reported a net income of -14.29M and revenue of 71.96M, resulting in a net margin of -19.9%.

BTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of -70.10M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.