GRVY vs. BTU
GRVY (Gravity Co., Ltd.) and BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) are both stocks. GRVY operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while BTU operates in Thermal Coal (Energy). Over the past 5 years, GRVY returned -9.72%/yr vs 25.81%/yr for BTU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRVY vs. BTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRVY achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -18.35% return.
GRVY
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 15.14%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- -0.68%
- 5Y*
- -9.72%
- 10Y*
- 40.14%
BTU
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -18.35%
- 6M
- -21.01%
- 1Y
- 81.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 25.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GRVY vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 15.14% | -8.30% | -9.27% | 72.52% | -40.81% | -62.31% | 383.26% | -10.85% | -11.22% | 353.45% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | -18.35% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 31.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRVY and BTU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
GRVY:
₩11.03K
BTU:
-$0.44
GRVY:
1.19
BTU:
0.76
GRVY:
₩597.40B
BTU:
$3.86B
GRVY:
₩202.13B
BTU:
$318.50M
GRVY:
₩75.32B
BTU:
$401.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRVY vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank
GRVY
BTU
GRVY vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gravity Co., Ltd. (GRVY) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRVY | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.02 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 4.53 | -3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRVY vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRVY drawdown since its inception was -97.27%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRVY and BTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRVY | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.27% | -98.07% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.51% | -40.67% | +18.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.93% | -65.14% | +26.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.67% | -67.44% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.57% | -41.58% | -27.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.35% | -48.04% | -23.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.26% | 18.12% | -5.86% |
Volatility
GRVY vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gravity Co., Ltd. (GRVY) is 16.91%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that GRVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRVY | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.91% | 22.35% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.56% | 42.09% | -15.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.23% | 60.65% | -29.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.11% | 66.28% | -23.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.92% | 77.73% | -1.81% |
Dividends
GRVY vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison
GRVY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.24% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% |
GRVY Gravity Co., Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GRVY vs. BTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gravity Co., Ltd. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRVY vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison
GRVY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gravity Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 53.20B and revenue of 166.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.9%.
BTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 49.70M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.9%.
GRVY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gravity Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of 31.84B and revenue of 166.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
BTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 19.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
GRVY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gravity Co., Ltd. reported a net income of 30.27B and revenue of 166.72B, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.
BTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRVY and BTU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTU has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to GRVY (16.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRVY dropped -97.27% vs BTU's -98.07%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRVY and BTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer