GQGU vs. MFUS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GQGU is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Over the past year, GQGU returned 7.17% vs 25.38% for MFUS. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.

Performance

GQGU vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.05% return.

GQGU

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 2.86%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 1Y: 7.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.35%

MFUS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 11.41%
• YTD: 16.05%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	$4.04M	$3.49M	$3.46M
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	$1.61M	$1.05M	$936.81K

GQGU vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	6.80%	-1.12%
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	16.05%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and MFUS is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

GQGU vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQGU

GQGU Risk / Return Rank: 26
GQGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GQGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GQGU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GQGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GQGU Martin Ratio Rank: 25

MFUS

MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 89
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQGU vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQGU	MFUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	2.16	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	3.11	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.39	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	3.86	-3.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.92	14.64	-12.72

GQGU vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQGU and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and MFUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQGU	MFUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-35.21%	+26.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.41%	-6.39%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	-2.61%	-1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-3.95%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	1.68%	+1.96%

Volatility

GQGU vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQGU	MFUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	2.93%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	9.11%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.67%	11.43%	-0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.58%	15.02%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.58%	17.28%	-6.70%

GQGU vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQGU vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than MFUS's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.95%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	1.38%	1.54%	1.45%	1.96%	2.07%	1.35%	1.72%	1.89%	1.69%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQGU and MFUS in my portfolio?

GQGU and MFUS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQGU or MFUS?

MFUS has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to GQGU (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQGU dropped -8.41% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

Which ETF is better, GQGU or MFUS?

On 1-year performance, MFUS leads with 25.38% vs 7.17% for GQGU. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GQGU or MFUS?

Over the 1-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 25.38% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQGU or MFUS?

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQGU or MFUS?

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.95% for GQGU.

What is the main difference between GQGU and MFUS?

They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.30% for MFUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.