PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPRF vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPRF vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than GSIE's 6.51% return.


GPRF

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.14%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.66%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSIE

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
9.50%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPRF vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and GSIE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024

0.44

GPRF vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPRF
GSIE

Financial Services

20.6%
27.1%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.2%

Utilities

2.5%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
9.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.8%

Industrials

0.4%
18.0%

Basic Materials

-

5.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.2%

Energy

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

9.1%

Technology

-

9.5%

Financial Services

GPRF
20.6%
GSIE
27.1%

Real Estate

GPRF
3.4%
GSIE
1.2%

Utilities

GPRF
2.5%
GSIE
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GPRF
0.9%
GSIE
9.1%

Communication Services

GPRF
0.5%
GSIE
3.8%

Industrials

GPRF
0.4%
GSIE
18.0%

Basic Materials

GPRF

-

GSIE
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

GPRF

-

GSIE
7.2%

Energy

GPRF

-

GSIE
4.4%

Healthcare

GPRF

-

GSIE
9.1%

Technology

GPRF

-

GSIE
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPRF vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRF
GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRF vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPRFGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.81

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

6.87

+0.64

GPRF vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRF Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRF and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPRFGSIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.38

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.52

+0.86

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and GSIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPRFGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-34.63%

+30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-10.76%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.19%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-6.06%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.82%

-1.94%

Volatility

GPRF vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is 0.78%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that GPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPRFGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

4.38%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

11.60%

-8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

14.15%

-10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.94%

16.04%

-12.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

16.75%

-12.81%

GPRF vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPRF vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than GSIE's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPRF
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF
5.65%5.38%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.52%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPRF and GSIE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIE has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to GPRF (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

On 1-year performance, GSIE leads with 19.35% vs 6.57% for GPRF. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GPRF has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GPRF.

GPRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 2.52% for GSIE.

GPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GPRF tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.25% for GSIE.

GPRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPRF and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer