GPRF vs. PGF
GPRF (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF) and PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds - GPRF tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index while PGF tracks the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GPRF returned 3.56% vs 1.28% for PGF. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GPRF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PGF.
Performance
GPRF vs. PGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than PGF's -0.42% return.
GPRF
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.81%
PGF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 1.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.04K | $1.42M | $824.22K | |
| $1.98M | $1.71M | $1.81M |
GPRF vs. PGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 0.94% | 6.17% | 2.49% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.42% | 3.40% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRF and PGF is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between GPRF and PGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPRF vs. PGF — Risk / Return Rank
GPRF
PGF
GPRF vs. PGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPRF | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.29 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 0.52 | +3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPRF vs. PGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum PGF drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and PGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRF | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -75.69% | +71.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -4.69% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -5.47% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -6.99% | +6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 2.60% | -1.67% |
Volatility
GPRF vs. PGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is 0.82%, while Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that GPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPRF | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 1.13% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.12% | 3.97% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 5.93% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 11.37% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 12.00% | -8.15% |
GPRF vs. PGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PGF's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPRF vs. PGF - Dividend Comparison
GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than PGF's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 5.23% | 5.38% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.42% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPRF and PGF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGF has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to GPRF (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs PGF's -75.69%.
On 1-year performance, GPRF leads with 3.56% vs 1.28% for PGF. On fees, GPRF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GPRF has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPRF has performed better with a 3.56% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPRF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 5.23% for GPRF.
GPRF tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.62% for PGF.
GPRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPRF and PGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer