GPN vs. EQT
GPN (Global Payments Inc.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. GPN operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, GPN returned -0.28%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for EQT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPN vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed EQT with an annualized return of -0.28%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.39% annualized return.
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
EQT
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -5.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
GPN vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
EQT EQT Corporation | -2.55% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and EQT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GPN and EQT has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GPN:
-$3.90
EQT:
$5.40
GPN:
1.39
EQT:
3.21
GPN:
$8.83B
EQT:
$10.03B
GPN:
$4.25B
EQT:
$6.43B
GPN:
$2.27B
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPN vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
GPN
EQT
GPN vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPN | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.22 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | -0.47 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPN vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPN | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -91.51% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.95% | -24.42% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -31.62% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.52% | -42.56% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -88.28% | +18.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.54% | -23.32% | -44.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -23.34% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 11.47% | +3.45% |
Volatility
GPN vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.36%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPN | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.23% | 8.36% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 21.09% | +9.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.63% | 32.56% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.64% | 42.79% | -6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 48.90% | -14.35% |
Dividends
GPN vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than EQT's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Financials
GPN vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPN vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPN and EQT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.17% vs EQT's -91.51%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPN and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer