GPN vs. FIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GPN or FIS.
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and FIS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GPN vs. FIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GPN:
-0.53
FIS:
1.57
GPN:
-0.58
FIS:
2.35
GPN:
0.92
FIS:
1.28
GPN:
-0.27
FIS:
0.55
GPN:
-0.73
FIS:
6.47
GPN:
20.87%
FIS:
4.87%
GPN:
28.59%
FIS:
20.02%
GPN:
-56.97%
FIS:
-67.65%
GPN:
-48.08%
FIS:
-43.36%
Fundamentals
GPN:
$28.20B
FIS:
$43.67B
GPN:
$5.30
FIS:
$0.97
GPN:
20.91
FIS:
83.62
GPN:
0.43
FIS:
0.60
GPN:
$7.59B
FIS:
$7.53B
GPN:
$4.78B
FIS:
$2.84B
GPN:
$3.16B
FIS:
$2.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FIS's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has outperformed FIS with an annualized return of 10.18%, while FIS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.36% annualized return.
GPN
-1.50%
-1.75%
8.89%
-17.73%
-10.61%
10.18%
FIS
-0.51%
-1.52%
5.62%
28.91%
-9.59%
4.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GPN vs. FIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GPN
FIS
GPN vs. FIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GPN vs. FIS - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FIS's 1.79% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 0.91% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.10% |
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.78% | 4.33% | 2.77% | 1.43% | 0.99% | 1.01% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.72% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
GPN vs. FIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, smaller than the maximum FIS drawdown of -67.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and FIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GPN vs. FIS - Volatility Comparison
Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) at 5.18%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GPN vs. FIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities