PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIQ vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than GSEW's 9.52% return.


GPIQ

1D
-0.19%
1M
8.51%
YTD
18.30%
6M
17.64%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSEW

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.82%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
18.30%19.77%23.22%15.38%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.52%11.97%16.89%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and GSEW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.69

The correlation between GPIQ and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIQ
GSEW

Technology

53.8%
20.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
5.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
11.3%

Industrials

2.9%
15.6%

Utilities

1.4%
5.8%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.6%

Energy

0.6%
4.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
14.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
4.0%

Technology

GPIQ
53.8%
GSEW
20.9%

Communication Services

GPIQ
15.8%
GSEW
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GPIQ
12.3%
GSEW
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

GPIQ
7.7%
GSEW
5.7%

Healthcare

GPIQ
4.2%
GSEW
11.3%

Industrials

GPIQ
2.9%
GSEW
15.6%

Utilities

GPIQ
1.4%
GSEW
5.8%

Basic Materials

GPIQ
1.1%
GSEW
4.6%

Energy

GPIQ
0.6%
GSEW
4.9%

Financial Services

GPIQ
0.2%
GSEW
14.3%

Real Estate

GPIQ
0.1%
GSEW
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIQGSEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.27

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

2.45

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.48

9.35

+8.13

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIQGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.56

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.61

+1.17

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIQGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-38.65%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-7.72%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.66%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-5.89%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.02%

+0.13%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.76%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIQGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.76%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

9.05%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

12.12%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

16.91%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

19.20%

-1.73%

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIQ vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than GSEW's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.32%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIQ and GSEW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIQ has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 37.50% vs 18.80% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 37.50% return vs 18.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.

GPIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.09% for GSEW.

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIQ and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer