GOLD vs. CLS
GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. GOLD operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOLD vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 31.00% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return.
GOLD
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 14.78%
- YTD
- 31.00%
- 6M
- 40.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 213.67%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
GOLD vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 31.00% | 13.01% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | -7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLD and CLS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
GOLD:
$1.17B
CLS:
$45.48B
GOLD:
$3.06
CLS:
$8.28
GOLD:
14.44
CLS:
47.45
GOLD:
0.05
CLS:
3.30
GOLD:
1.38
CLS:
21.68
GOLD:
$23.02B
CLS:
$13.81B
GOLD:
$169.58M
CLS:
$1.60B
GOLD:
-$162.41M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLD vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
GOLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLS
GOLD vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLD | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLD vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLD | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -96.93% | +56.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.46% | -16.78% | -13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.05% | -73.31% | +55.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.98% | — |
Volatility
GOLD vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLD | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.55% | 72.65% | -14.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.55% | 57.70% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.55% | 49.97% | +8.58% |
Dividends
GOLD vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% |
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 0.90% |
Financials
GOLD vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Mining Corporation and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOLD vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
GOLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 176.58M and revenue of 10.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.7%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
GOLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 106.13M and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
GOLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a net income of 59.49M and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLD and CLS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GOLD and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer